🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he holds objections.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect similar debates in other EU countries