🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful first step," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have raised concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the regional level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from these regions, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in safety.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that governments globally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.